Fixed Income Quarterly Commentary – Q2 2025

TARIFF TURBULENCE, ECONOMY HOLDS UP Tariff policy—the announcements, reactions, and adjustments—were a defining feature of the second quarter. The country […]

Tariff policy—the announcements, reactions, and adjustments—were a defining feature of the second quarter. The country specific (“reciprocal”) tariffs announced on “Liberation Day” on April 2 were substantially larger than expected. The announcement disrupted global markets, heightening policy uncertainty and tightening financial conditions. A week later, this led the Administration to pause tariffs above 10% for most countries. In May, the tariff rate on Chinese goods was
lowered to 30% from 145%, which was enacted in April. These adjustments from the Administration to avoid worst-case economic outcomes helped catalyze a meaningful rebound in risk assets. Still, the average effective tariff rate of around 15% remains notably higher than its level last year, and there is considerable uncertainty about its future level. Longer-term effects on inflation and real economic activity remain unclear.

The new tariffs raised concerns about higher inflation and slower growth. Consumer and business sentiment surveys deteriorated in April due to the large spike in tariffs but recovered somewhat by the end of the quarter. Near-term inflation expectations rose. In several surveys, the majority of businesses said that they would pass at least some of the tariff costs to their customers. The so-called soft data, which includes measures of expectations, reacted more quickly to the policy changes than the hard data on prices and employment.

Despite the expected increase in inflation due to the tariffs, the inflation data in the second quarter surprised to the downside. The CPI YoY fell to 2.4% in May, down from 2.8% in February, and there were few signs of tariff-cost pressures. The modest increase in goods inflation was outweighed by further moderation in shelter and other core services inflation . Core CPI fell to 2.8%. PCE prices rose 2.3% YoY and Core PCE 2.7% YoY in May, both lower than February. Core services have been the source of excess inflation, so that these developments would have, in the absence of higher tariffs, set the Fed on the path to rate cuts. The uncertainty about how large and persistent the tariff effects on inflation will prove to be kept the Fed on pause.


The resilience of the labor market supported the Fed’s case for waiting. The labor market held up well in Q2 despite survey expectations for some softening. The unemployment rate was 4.2% in Q2, within the narrow range of the past year. Payrolls averaged 150,000 per month, up slightly from around 110,000 in Q1. Job gains were concentrated, and the hiring rate remained low. Wages rose 3.7% YoY in June, a bit below the 3.9% YoY pace in March.


The Fed held rates at 4.3%, extending the pause into the first quarter. In June, most Fed officials expected that it would be appropriate to reduce rates before the end of the year, but there was substantial disagreement on the magnitude. Some
officials did not see any cuts this year. The risks around tariffs were the driver of the Fed’s outlook. With inflation above the Fed’s 2% target for more than four years, the Fed is particularly sensitive to how tariffs might extend that gap. Unless the labor market weakens materially, we expect the Fed to remain on pause until the fall. Further increases in tariff rates could extend the pause.

Following the shock of tariff announcements and accompanying spike in volatility on April 2nd, markets spent the rest of the quarter recovering.  The nominal Treasury yield curve steepened with short rates falling and long rates rising as the combination of slower growth and greater deficits as a result of the budget bill was priced in. The real yield curve did the same curve shift, with short dated breakevens repricing inflation downwards. For the quarter, TIPS underperformed comparable Treasuries by 48 bps. Spread sectors marched tighter as volatility declined, with corporates recovering from the spread widening of early April. The Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index returned 1.21%. Equities rebounded from Q1 declines, with the S&P returning 10.94%, as IT stocks, along with Metals & Mining, up over 20% in Q2. Small caps participated in the rally, but at 8.50% for the Russell 2000, they lagged large cap overall. In commodities, precious metals continued to rise, while fuel prices declined.

Macro uncertainty and market volatility is likely to persist through the second half of 2025, impacting consumer and business spending plans. After frontloading imports ahead of tariffs, we expect some near-term payback in consumption and growth. Tariff impacts should finally show up in inflation data in the next quarters.

Duration (Overweight): An increase in policy uncertainty and deterioration in the growth outlook in response to tariffs increases the risk of a recession. This should cause interest rates to fall from current levels. The Fed will proceed with a cautious approach to cutting interest rates given the risks of higher inflation in the near-term. However, a continued deterioration in the hard data over the coming months should force them to cut, potentially by a significant amount. The market implied long-term Fed Funds rate, at 3%, is too high. It should fall, potentially by another 50-75 basis points over time, to reflect the likelihood of a growth slowdown in the coming quarters.

Term Structure(Overweight intermediate maturity bonds): Favor intermediate maturity bonds based on our view the terminal Fed Funds rate is still too high. It should decline to reflect the risk of a recession in the coming quarters, which is bullish for intermediate maturity bonds. In addition, overweighting intermediate bonds gains exposure to a steepening yield curve (which we favor), while maintaining a duration overweight..

Credit (Underweight): Underweight given tight valuations that do not reflect risks of a slowing economic growth environment. See better value in agency MBS and ABS sectors. Favor 5-10 year maturities vs. an underweight in long credit, primarily in high quality 30 year Industrials. Prefer to stay up in quality in cyclically resistant sectors, and favor issuers with low event risk and a commitment to IG ratings. Also favor issuers and sectors that will be less impacted by tariffs, like telecommunications. Avoiding issuers and sectors that will feel a material negative impact from tariffs, have high M&A and re-leveraging risk or have a history of shareholder-friendly actions.

ABS (Overweight): ABS offers attractive carry and better downside protection vs. investment-grade credit. Favor digital infrastructure (data center and fiber securities).

Agency MBS (Overweight): Mortgages remain cheap relative to investment-grade credit. Favor lower coupon, credit impaired bonds which have higher prepayments, and will do well if the yield curve steepens. Also favor 5.0-5.5% coupon bonds (including CMOs) which offer attractive carry, enough discount to perform well into a rate rally, and limited extension risk.

Non-Agency RMBS (Overweight): Favor AAA-rated, deep discount, positively convex mortgages that will benefit from a rally in short and intermediate yields. Also favor new issue, high coupon securities with limited extension risk.

CMBS (Overweight) : Favor an overweight short maturity, AAA-rated CMBS relative to investment-grade credit. Select front-pay bonds trade at maximum extension and will benefit from unscheduled cash flows (defaults).

Inflation (Overweight): At 1.4-2.5%, real yields are too high. TIPS remain an attractive hedge for structurally higher inflation.

Our Multi-Asset strategy delivered a 2.81% return in Q2, exceeding CPI by 202 basis points. Markets remained sensitive to policy signals, and volatility was driven by fluctuating expectations around growth, inflation, and rates. Against this backdrop, our strategy remained both resilient and responsive.  Performance was supported by targeted positioning, with all component asset classes having positive returns. Miners and non-U.S. equities were standout contributors and helped offset underperformance from MLPs and REITs. The weakening of the U.S. dollar enhanced the value of our local EM debt exposure, while declining yields boosted returns from short-duration TIPS and short Treasuries. Commodities were led by strength in precious metals, and callable agencies performed well, supported by strong carry. Our short-dated floating-rate corporate bond holdings benefited from the “higher-for-longer” policy stance, and agency MBS subtly added to returns.

We trimmed TIPS as inflation protection became fully priced, reduced inflation-sensitive assets such as MLPs and materials, and added selectively to risk after the post-tariff selloff. Income-generating positions in securitized credit, short corporates, and EM equities were maintained, while we increased exposure to non-U.S. equities for capital growth. We also held onto gold and introduced more cash and Treasuries to stay balanced. The way each asset contributed reflects a focus on steady positioning in a market where perspectives—and opportunities—continue to evolve.

Important Disclosures:

Scroll to Top